{"id":1475,"date":"2019-10-22T10:16:36","date_gmt":"2019-10-22T07:16:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sozbizde.com\/?p=1475"},"modified":"2019-10-22T10:16:36","modified_gmt":"2019-10-22T07:16:36","slug":"mahkeme-tuketicinin-arac-alirken-tramere-bakma-zorunlulugu-yok-dedi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/2019\/10\/22\/mahkeme-tuketicinin-arac-alirken-tramere-bakma-zorunlulugu-yok-dedi\/","title":{"rendered":"MAHKEME: \u201cT\u00dcKET\u0130C\u0130N\u0130N ARA\u00c7 ALIRKEN TRAMERE BAKMA ZORUNLULU\u011eU YOK\u201d DED\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130zmir\u2019de B.\u00d6. isimli vatanda\u015f, ekspertiz kontrol\u00fc yapt\u0131rmadan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 otomobili ay\u0131pl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. T\u00fcketici konuyu mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131yarak 40 bin lira tazminat kazand\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ara\u00e7 Kazal\u0131 \u00c7\u0131kt\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u0130zmir\u2019de vatanda\u015f B.\u00d6, \u0130zmir\u2019de faaliyet g\u00f6steren \u00d6.A. Ltd. \u015eti\u2019nden 325.000 TL\u2019lik BMW marka bir ara\u00e7 sat\u0131n ald\u0131. Sat\u0131\u015f esnas\u0131nda daval\u0131 \u015firketin beyan\u0131na g\u00fcvenen B.\u00d6. arac\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131. Bu esnada ara\u00e7 \u00fczerinde herhangi ekspertiz incelemesi yapt\u0131rmayan ve tramer sorgusu yapmayan vatanda\u015f, arac\u0131 belli bir s\u00fcre kulland\u0131ktan sonra arac\u0131 ba\u015fka birine satmak istedi. Arac\u0131n eksper taramas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda kazal\u0131 oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frenen ma\u011fdur B.\u00d6. solu\u011fu Avukat Alperen Cihan \u00c7etinkaya\u2019n\u0131n yan\u0131nda ald\u0131. B.\u00d6. Avukat \u00c7etinkaya arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u0130zmir 5. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesine tespit ve tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mahkeme Al\u0131c\u0131y\u0131 Hakl\u0131 Buldu<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda yerel mahkeme \u2018\u2018Vatanda\u015f\u0131n arac\u0131 ekspertize g\u00f6sterme veya tramer sorgusu yapt\u0131rma zorunlulu\u011fu yoktur, sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren \u015firket ise serbest meslek erbab\u0131 oldu\u011fundan ay\u0131pl\u0131 maldan sorumlulu\u011fu vard\u0131r.\u2019\u2019 diyerek, daval\u0131 \u015firketin, vatanda\u015fa 40.000 TL tazminata \u00f6demesine h\u00fckmetti. Mahkeme sonras\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131klama yapan Avukat Alperen Cihan \u00c7etinkaya, \u015f\u00f6yle konu\u015ftu:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cM\u00fcvekkilim, ticaretle u\u011fra\u015fmayan bir vatanda\u015f olarak g\u00fcvene dayanarak ara\u00e7 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, vatanda\u015f\u0131n ara\u00e7 al\u0131rken arac\u0131 ekspertize g\u00f6sterme veya tramer sorgusu yapt\u0131rma gibi bir zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamaktad\u0131r. \u00a0Ancak aksine bu i\u015fi ticaret olarak yapan daval\u0131n\u0131n ise d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131 ve g\u00fcvene dayal\u0131 bir ticaretle ba\u011fl\u0131 olan daval\u0131n\u0131n, piyasa de\u011feri 285 bin lira olan arac\u0131 325 bin liraya satmas\u0131 kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bu zarar\u0131n firmadan tahsil edilmesi amac\u0131yla dava a\u00e7t\u0131k. Mahkeme, bizim talebimizi hakl\u0131 g\u00f6rerek daval\u0131n\u0131n 40 bin lira tazminat \u00f6demesine h\u00fckmetti\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Daval\u0131, Reddini \u0130stedi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 Firma ise mahkemeye g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi savunmas\u0131nda, davac\u0131 B.\u00d6.\u2019n\u00fcn al\u0131m-sat\u0131m esnas\u0131nda bu ay\u0131b\u0131 rahatl\u0131kla tramer sorgusuyla g\u00f6rebilece\u011fini veya ekspertize g\u00f6stererek tespit edebilece\u011fini, vatanda\u015f\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli oldu\u011funu belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini istedi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130zmir\u2019de B.\u00d6. isimli vatanda\u015f, ekspertiz kontrol\u00fc yapt\u0131rmadan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 otomobili ay\u0131pl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. T\u00fcketici konuyu mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131yarak 40 bin lira tazminat kazand\u0131. Ara\u00e7 Kazal\u0131 \u00c7\u0131kt\u0131 \u0130zmir\u2019de<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1476,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,36],"tags":[312,10,310,311,40],"class_list":["post-1475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genel","category-sosyal-medyadan","tag-adalet","tag-izmir","tag-kusurlu-arac","tag-mahkeme","tag-turkiye"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1475"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1475\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1477,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1475\/revisions\/1477"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1476"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}