\u0130zmir\u2019in \u00f6nemli su havzalar\u0131ndan Efem\u00e7ukuru\u2019ndaki madencilik faaliyetlerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130ZSU Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen hukuk m\u00fccadelesinde sevindirici bir geli\u015fme ya\u015fand\u0131. Madenin kapasite art\u0131\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u201c\u00c7ED olumlu\u201d karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygunlu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahkemenin gerekli incelemeyi yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi, \u0130ZSU\u2019nun temyiz talebini hakl\u0131 buldu. Madenin \u00e7evreye verece\u011fi olas\u0131 zararlara ili\u015fkin yeniden bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lacak.<\/p>\n
\u0130ZSU Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn Efem\u00e7ukuru Alt\u0131n Madeni Kapasite Art\u0131\u015f\u0131 projesine kar\u015f\u0131 hukuki zeminde y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7evre m\u00fccadelesi s\u00fcr\u00fcyor. Menderes il\u00e7esi Efem\u00e7ukuru k\u00f6y\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 ve \u00c7aml\u0131 Baraj\u0131 Uzun Mesafeli Koruma Alan\u0131 i\u00e7indeki proje i\u00e7in verilen \u201c\u00c7ED olumlu\u201d karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada yeni bir a\u015famaya ge\u00e7ildi. Madenin \u00e7evreye verece\u011fi zararlar\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in yeniden bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istendi.<\/p>\n
Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi \u0130ZSU\u2019yu hakl\u0131 buldu<\/strong><\/p>\n Maden sahas\u0131n\u0131n, Tahtal\u0131, Bal\u00e7ova ve Alionba\u015f\u0131 baraj havzalar\u0131 ile b\u00f6lgedeki i\u00e7me suyu yeralt\u0131 kaynaklar\u0131n\u0131 tehdit etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle \u0130zmir 6. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvuran \u0130ZSU, \u00c7ED olumlu karar\u0131n\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015f, verilen iptal karar\u0131 daha sonra Bakanl\u0131k ve \u015firketin temyiz etmesi \u00fczerine Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan bozulmu\u015ftu. Ancak m\u00fccadeleden vazge\u00e7meyen \u0130ZSU Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u015firket faaliyetlerinin yeniden \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7an mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc. Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi \u0130ZSU\u2019nun temyiz talebini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6rerek, \u00c7ED olumlu karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygunlu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahkemenin gerekli incelemeyi yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti. \u0130zmir 6. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n bozma karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda madenin i\u015fletilmesinin her a\u015famas\u0131nda ve i\u015fletmenin faaliyetinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra \u00e7evreye herhangi bir zarar\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\n \u201c\u0130zmir\u2019in su kaynaklar\u0131 i\u00e7in sonuna kadar m\u00fccadele edece\u011fiz\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Bu geli\u015fmenin ard\u0131ndan \u0130ZSU Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019nden yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, su varl\u0131klar\u0131ndaki azalman\u0131n t\u00fcm d\u00fcnyada \u00f6nemli boyutlara ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 dile getirilerek, \u201c\u0130zmir\u2019de de kentin mevcut ve potansiyel su kaynaklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kirlilikten uzak tutulmas\u0131 bir zorunluluktur. Bu bilin\u00e7le g\u00f6revini yerine getiren \u0130ZSU Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u0130zmirliler ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu m\u00fccadeleyi sonuna kadar g\u00f6t\u00fcrmekte kararl\u0131d\u0131r\u201d denildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u0130zmir\u2019in \u00f6nemli su havzalar\u0131ndan Efem\u00e7ukuru\u2019ndaki madencilik faaliyetlerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130ZSU Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen hukuk m\u00fccadelesinde sevindirici bir geli\u015fme ya\u015fand\u0131. Madenin kapasite art\u0131\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u201c\u00c7ED<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,6],"tags":[1265,10,132,1260],"class_list":["post-9565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genel","category-yerel-yonetimler","tag-efemcukuru","tag-izmir","tag-izmir-buyuksehir-belediyesi","tag-izsu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9565"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9565\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9568,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9565\/revisions\/9568"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arsiv.sozbizde.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}